top of page

Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118

  • Writer: Head Editor
    Head Editor
  • Jun 10, 2023
  • 2 min read

Gleeson CJ, Gummow and Kirby JJ


Facts: The case of Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 HCA involved a dispute over the ownership and copyright of a photograph taken during the Sydney Olympic Games in 2000. Roberta Fox, a professional photographer, captured an image of Cathy Freeman, an Australian sprinter, carrying both the Australian and Aboriginal flags after winning a gold medal. Fox later sought to enforce her copyright and claimed that her permission should be obtained before the photograph could be used.


The respondent in the case, Tony Percy, was the editor of The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) newspaper. Percy reproduced the photograph without obtaining Fox's permission, arguing that the photograph was taken in a public place and, therefore, no permission was necessary. Fox disagreed and contended that her photograph should be considered an artistic work protected by copyright law.


Issue: The High Court of Australia considered two main issues in this case:


1. Whether the photograph could be considered an artistic work protected by copyright.

2. Whether the reproduction of the photograph constituted a fair dealing for the purpose of reporting the news.


Regarding the first issue, the High Court of Australia (HCA) held that the photograph taken by Fox was an artistic work protected by copyright. The Court recognized the skill and creativity involved in capturing the moment and deemed the photograph to possess the qualities of originality and expression required for copyright protection.


However, on the second issue, the Court found in favour of Percy. They concluded that the reproduction of the photograph by The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) constituted a fair dealing for the purpose of reporting the news. The Court emphasized the importance of freedom of the press and held that the reproduction of the photograph was within the bounds of legitimate news reporting and public interest.


Conclusion: In summary, while Fox's photograph was deemed to be protected by copyright, its reproduction by The Sydney Morning Herald was considered a fair dealing for the purpose of reporting news, thus not infringing on Fox's copyright.


85 Comments


hometogelv
4 days ago

Good article! Clear and easy-to-understand content like this is very helpful for readers. I’ve noticed that platforms such as Juan365 com also value simplicity and accessibility. Thanks for sharing!

Like

nevastechbc
Dec 23, 2025

QuickBooks to Dynamics 365 Business Central Migration


The initial choice towards QuickBooks is pretty obvious and more likely to be the fast and easy decision for a small businesses or say, micro businesses at the beginning. As the small business takes shape towards the growth in market, its complexity also gets increased alongside which is when QuickBooks can no longer suffice the needs of the business.


Hence, it is important and much needed to migrate to Dynamics 365 Business Central for its ease of use and fulfilment for the complex needs of the growing small businesses and mid-size businesses.

Like

usama khan
usama khan
Nov 04, 2025

The message “Trust us to be your go-to destination” is bold but backed up by details, which is a good balance check this source out

Like

usama khan
usama khan
Nov 04, 2025

The site could perhaps add pricing or package examples to further help prospective customers decide, but the current content still builds good trust view more 

Like

usama khan
usama khan
Nov 04, 2025

It’s refreshing to see a pet wellness partner rather than just a service provider — the wording emphasises a relationship https://hellohumansg.my.canva.site/.

Like

In the spirit of reconciliation, Survive Law acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their Elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.

© Survive Law 2023

bottom of page