top of page

Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353

  • Writer: Survive Law
    Survive Law
  • Dec 8, 2021
  • 2 min read

Contract Law - Enforcement of Informal Agreements - Sale of Land

Facts: On 6 December 1951, the parties signed a written memorandum for the sale of Cameron’s farm to Masters. The memorandum expressed “this agreement is made subject to the preparation of a formal contract, which shall be acceptable to Cameron’s solicitors on the terms and conditions”.


On the same day of the signing of the memorandum, Masters paid a deposit in the sum of 1,750 pounds to Cameron’s real estate agent. Masters subsequently ran into financial difficulties and sought to withdraw from the purchase, and claimed he was entitled to a refund. Cameron then claimed the memorandum created a binding and enforceable contract between the parties, despite the absence of a formal written contract.


Issue: Did the written memorandum create a binding and enforceable contract?


Holding: In a unanimous decision, the High Court of Australia held in favour of Masters, holding that the memorandum did not create a binding and enforceable contract for the sale of Cameron’s farm. The High Court’s reasons are such as:

1. The parties may have finalized all the terms of their bargain and intend to be bound immediately, but propose to restate the terms in a form which is more precise, but not different in effect. Therefore, the parties are bound, whether or not a formal document is ever signed.

2. The parties may have completely agreed upon all the terms of their bargain and do not intend to vary those terms, but have made performance of one or more terms conditional upon the execution of a formal document. In this type of agreement, the parties are bound to bring the formal document into existence. This is also seen in the case of Godecke v Kirwan (1973).

3. The parties may not intend to make a binding agreement at all unless and until they execute a formal contract. In this case, the parties are not bound unless a formal document is executed.


All in all, these types of agreements are not intended to be legally enforceable, nor binding.

By Kubra Yazici


52 Comments


FAUZI 88
FAUZI 88
Aug 23

TOTO TOGEL


 SLOT


 TOTO SLOT


 SONTOGEL DAFTAR


 SONTOGEL LOGIN


 SITUS SONTOGEL


 SONTOGEL SLOT


 SONTOGEL TOGEL


 LINK SONTOGEL

 I love the art style—it’s unique and visually appealing,thank you

Like

FAUZI 88
FAUZI 88
Aug 23

SITUS SLOT


 SLOT GACOR


 SLOT GACOR HARI INI


 SLOT88

I like that the art style is interesting and eye-catching

Like

FAUZI 88
FAUZI 88
Aug 23

TOTO SLOT


 SESETOTO


 LINK SESETOTO


 SESETOTO SLOT


 SESETOTO TOGEL


 SESETOTO 4D


 RTP SESETOTO


 SESE TOTO GACOR

 I love the art style—it’s unique and visually appealing,thank you

Like

FAUZI 88
FAUZI 88
Aug 23

SITUS TOTO


 TOTO SLOT


 Togel Online


 Toto Togel


 Toto


 Situs Togel


 Slot Gacor

I like that the art style is interesting and eye-catching

Like

FAUZI 88
FAUZI 88
Aug 23

JADI TOTO DAFTAR


JADITOTO GACOR


LINK JADITOTO


SITUS JADITOTO


JADITOTO 4D


JADI TOTO SLOT


JADI TOTO LOGIN

 I love the art style—it’s unique and visually appealing,thank you

Like

In the spirit of reconciliation, Survive Law acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their Elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.

© Survive Law 2023

bottom of page